For my understanding, all the three articles point out the conflicts
between the industrialization of modern food production caused by out increasing
demand for food and the right way we should produce the food, from a
traditional and humanity’s perspective.
In Christopher Cook’s info graphic, “Fowl Trouble,” he introduces how
the workers in the chicken production industry were treated resulted by the
increasing demand for chicken. As more and more chicken were requested and consumed
and in order to make the demand and supply meet, USA upgrade the limited level
of bird which focused on inspector’s capability of exanimating the bird, but
fail to consider the amount that a farm work could handle. Underpayment,
serious working environment, and excessive working burden leading to the unhealthy
of worker’s physical condition, as well as their mental condition. It is ironical
to admit that such a fact runs contrary to the initial health-conscious
consideration-chicken is healthier than red meat.
In Michael Pollan’s piece,
“An Animal’s Place,” he claims about how the industrialization changes the treatment
of animals over time. Cited the example that how pigs and dogs used to get
Christmas gifts, Pollan seriously questions the attitude we have towards to
animals. With the progress and prosperous
the industry revolution bring to us, people were becoming more focusing on own
benefit than any other time. By illustrating that some animals are sentenced to
a life of suffering in our history, he makes an argument about whether or not
it is acceptable to breed animals for a life of suffering and whether or not
people should care about the procedure how their food were produced.
In Barry Estabrook’s
Introduction to “Tomatoland,” he write about how the demand and mass production
changes the way the tomato was originally produced. In his article, Barry cites
that tomato was initial found in northern Peru and southern Ecuador, which are
very dry regions that facilitate the growth of tomatoes. Now one third of tomatoes
are now grown in Florida in order to keep up with global demand. Florida is
humidity and not suitable for tomato’s growth, worker should spear more effect
to prevent the tomato from unharvest. Large demand and “severe” drive down the working
condition seriously.
In comparison, all the three pieces talked about the change in the
production procedure in mass-producing factories. Estabrook and Cook talk about
the worker quality, such as low wages, as well as the mental and physical harm
that comes with working in a modern day food factory. And Pollan
and Cook both talk about the mistreatment of animals. All in all, the three
article are similar since they talk about the negative effects caused by modern
mass production of food and such effect will continue to pass and a more wider
range of stakeholders will suffer if the prevent phenomena are unchanged.
This is a very well comparison and summary of the articles. You picked the essential portions of each article to display in your post that contributed to the overall questions that were asked.
ReplyDeleteYou do a great job of discussing what broader aspects of the articles are similar between the three. It was a very concise summary of the three articles and how they explain the history and production of food.
ReplyDelete